Publishing your e-mail on internet is strictly a No-NO, and might become an open invitation for bots, making it a principle, not to give your e-mail address anywhere, irrespective of situation, might, help, but again at times you feel it necessary to publish your e-mail address.出版电子邮件是互联网上没有严格的一氧化氮，并有可能成为一个开放邀请漫游，使之成为一项原则，不给您的电子邮件地址，任何地方，不论局势，可能会有所帮助，但有时又您觉得有必要发布您的e - mail地址。 Replacing the ‘@’ with ‘at’, and ‘.’ with ‘dot’, or using the image of the text of e-mail is also helpful.取代了' @ '与'为'和' 。 '与'点' ，或使用的形象文字的电子邮件也是有益的。

However,但是， Tinymail seems to be the solution, this online tool is handy enough, just type your e-mail address on the page and hit the ‘protect it’ button.似乎是解决方案，这个在线工具是不够方便，只需输入您的e - mail地址的网页并点击'保护'按钮。

Now you get HTML code, BB code, and a link which reveals your e-mail address, whoever wants to get your e-mail needs to go through Captcha, in order to get it.现在，你获得HTML代码，预算局代码，并联系这表明您的e - mail地址，谁要是想您的电子邮件需要经过Captcha ，为了得到它。

However, there is an analysis on然而，有一个分析 ghacks , which talks about the two flaws of this internet-tool, ，其中谈到了两个漏洞的互联网工具，

• Adds one more step to the contact process, ie finding your e-mail address is a lengthier process now.增加了一个步骤的接触过程，即找到您的e - mail地址是一个漫长的进程现在。
• Security using Captcha, is questionable. Captcha安全使用，是值得怀疑的。

So what do you think about it ?因此，您怎么看呢？ Should Tinymail, be used for e-mail publishing or not?应Tinymail ，用于电子邮件出版或不是吗？ Have your say, I am still in dilemma.你说，我仍然在困境。

Tags:标签： captcha , ， contact process接触过程 , ， e mail address电子邮件地址 , ， ghacks , ， mail publishing电子邮件出版 , ， open invitation公开邀请