Publishing your e-mail on internet is strictly a No-NO, and might become an open invitation for bots, making it a principle, not to give your e-mail address anywhere, irrespective of situation, might, help, but again at times you feel it necessary to publish your e-mail address.出版電子郵件是互聯網上沒有嚴格的一氧化氮，並有可能成為一個開放邀請漫遊，使之成為一項原則，不給您的電子郵件地址，任何地方，不論局勢，可能會有所幫助，但有時又您覺得有必要發布您的e - mail地址。 Replacing the ‘@’ with ‘at’, and ‘.’ with ‘dot’, or using the image of the text of e-mail is also helpful.取代了' @ '與'為'和' 。 '與'點' ，或使用的形象文字的電子郵件是有益的。

However,但是， Tinymail seems to be the solution, this online tool is handy enough, just type your e-mail address on the page and hit the ‘protect it’ button.似乎是解決方案，這個在線工具是不夠方便，只需輸入您的e - mail地址的網頁並點擊'保護'按鈕。

Now you get HTML code, BB code, and a link which reveals your e-mail address, whoever wants to get your e-mail needs to go through Captcha, in order to get it.現在，你獲得HTML代碼，預算局代碼，並聯繫這表明您的e - mail地址，誰要是想您的電子郵件需要經過Captcha ，為了得到它。

However, there is an analysis on然而，有一個分析 ghacks , which talks about the two flaws of this internet-tool, ，其中談到了兩個漏洞的互聯網工具，

• Adds one more step to the contact process, ie finding your e-mail address is a lengthier process now.增加了一個步驟的接觸過程，即找到您的e - mail地址是一個漫長的進程現在。
• Security using Captcha, is questionable. Captcha安全使用，是值得懷疑的。

So what do you think about it ?因此，您怎麼看呢？ Should Tinymail, be used for e-mail publishing or not?應Tinymail ，用於電子郵件出版或不是嗎？ Have your say, I am still in dilemma.你說，我仍然在困境。

Tags:標籤： captcha , ， contact process接觸過程 , ， e mail address電子郵件地址 , ， ghacks , ， mail publishing電子郵件出版 , ， open invitation公開邀請