Home  »  Networking Software and Tools

Send message to an IP Address

Author: |
August
19
2008
 Posted in Networking Software and Tools 7 Comments

IPMessage.net is a concept which allows you to send a message to any Ip address. The message itself doesnt go to that ip address but when the person with that IP visits the same site he sees the message displayed for him.

The idea is simple and pretty unique as it not only tells your IP but also allows you to send message which you can use it for private or secret message. I am not sure if this is going to work if somebody is using proxy.

So if you want to secretly send somebody a message and you know his or her Ip this can come in handy. Try IP Message

Related :  Chat on Lan with IP Messenger

Related posts:

  1. Chat on Lan with IP Messenger
  2. Synchronize chat messenger archive across multiple computers using Dropbox
  3. How to send free scheduled text messages from your Computer
  4. Send free sms to India from Desktop with AOL.IN
  5. iPhone not syncing with Yahoo address book [ Apple Updates ]

About Author

Ashish Mohta

A Professional Tech blogger, Editor and Writer who talks about solving day to day problems of people who use computer. His expertise are in Windows 7, Microsoft Office, Software, Mobile Apps and Video Posts. Connect with me on Twitter | Google Plus | Facebook

  • henryprince

    how do i do that
    how do i send a message from my ip address to some one ip address
    is there a program to do it

  • Spike

    Welcome to techspot.

    To answer your question, yes. skype, msn messenger, aim, yim… lol

    Seriously though, there is a tool embedded in windows xp… net send. it’s what produced those annoying pop-up messenger spam messages before sp2.

    syntax.. net send

    Doesn’t work though unless both machines have the messenger service running and are configured to allow the messages through firewalls.

  • Tedster

    yes…. you can use IM programs IF YOU LIKE VIRUSES, WORMS, and other attacks!

  • Spike

    well I WAS kinda joking about the IM programs. I’d never actually recomend IM programs to inexperienced netizens for obvious reasons. For the record though, I use MSN Messenger all the time. I’ve NOT ONCE caught a nasty from it. I’ve had a nasty offered to me twice, but I use common sense.

    Also, I don’t talk to random people – I talk only to those I know.

    I never give out personal or sensitive info, and I remain firewalled – through both my routers NAT and a software firewall on my machine, etc, etc, etc…

  • maradms4

    well I WAS kinda joking about the IM programs. I’d never actually recomend IM programs to inexperienced netizens for obvious reasons. For the record though, I use MSN Messenger all the time. I’ve NOT ONCE caught a nasty from it. I’ve had a nasty offered to me twice, but I use common sense.

    Also, I don’t talk to random people – I talk only to those I know.

    Good point, for IM progs to infect you , its normal practice to be asked if you want the infection(file transfer etc) and you gotta be crazy to say ‘yes please,do your worst!’

    so any infection is usually through user stupidity with IM progs

  • Spike

    Actually, that’s not entirely what I was saying. There’s more to it than just infection – IM technology has a whole host of security issues (potential or real), plus potentially creates yet another set of attack vectors on a targe machine using the technology (ie, just another thing that can go wrong). Instant messaging is inherantly insecure. For more details on why it’s inherantly insecure, you can use google, but if you can’t be bothered, I’ve searched up the following link…

    The above is a 2003 whitepaper, and some things may well have changed. I’ve only scanned it over briefly to find that it has relevant content, but don’t know how up to date it is. It will however give you a brief overview of the insecurity of IM technologies.

  • maradms4

    Actually, that’s not entirely what I was saying. There’s more to it than just infection – IM technology has a whole host of security issues (potential or real), plus potentially creates yet another set of attack vectors on a targe machine using the technology (ie, just another thing that can go wrong). Instant messaging is inherantly insecure. For more details on why it’s inherantly insecure, you can use google, but if you can’t be bothered, I’ve searched up the following link…

    The above is a 2003 whitepaper, and some things may well have changed. I’ve only scanned it over briefly to find that it has relevant content, but don’t know how up to date it is. It will however give you a brief overview of the insecurity of IM technologies.

    Interesting, good info. Think we should all read this…