![[تشنوسبوت] علامة تجاريّة](
http://img.technospot.net/assets/technospotbig.jpg)
أرسلت رسالة إلى [إيب دّرسّ]
IPMessage.net مفهوم أيّ يسمح أنت أن يرسل رسالة إلى أيّ [إيب دّرسّ]. لا يذهب الرسالة بنفسي إلى أنّ [إيب دّرسّ] غير أنّ عندما الشخص مع أنّ [إيب] يزور ال نفسه موقعة هو يرى الرسالة يعرض ل ه.
الفكرة بسيطة وجميلة فريد بما أنّ هو ليس فحسب يقول [إيب] ك غير أنّ أيضا يسمح أنت أن يرسل رسالة أيّ أنت يستطيع استعملت هو لخاصّة أو رسالة سرّيّة. أنا لست يوقن إن هذا يكون يذهب أن يعمل إن واحد ما يكون يستعمل توكيل.
عرفت هكذا إن أنت تريد أن سرّا أرسلت واحد ما رسالة وأنت [مي ور مي] [إيب] هذا يستطيع أتيت في عمليّة. محاولة [إيب] رسالة
متّصلة:? ثرثرة على [لن] مع [إيب] رسول
بطاقات: [إيب] رسول, أرسلت [إيب] رسالة, [تكبمسّنجر]
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
![[سمس] يكتتب](http://img.technospot.net/assets/sms-subscribe.jpg)
يعيّن في [19ث] أغسطس - آب 2008 جانبا [أشيش] [موهتا] , [ا] تكنولوجيا [بلوغّر] الذي يكتب حول يحلّ مشاكل يوميّة الناس الذي يستعمل حاسوب. هو أيضا يكتب على كيف أن يستعمل التطبيقات مثل مكتب, [بك] أطراف, أدوات متوفّر على شبكة الإنترنات, [برووسر] وأكثر. كلّ موقعات جانبا [أشيش] [موهتا] | ربطت مع ي @
[تويتّر] |
[لينكدين] |
[فسبووك] |
زلة
| احتجت كثير مساعدة? سألت أسئلتك في نا [سوبّورت سنتر]
أتمّت كيف أتمّ أنا أنّ
كيف أنا أرسل رسالة من [إيب دّرسّ] ي إلى أحد ما [إيب دّرسّ]
هناك برنامج أن يتمّ هو
ترحيب إلى [تشسبوت].
أن يجيب سؤالك, نعم. [سكب], [مسن] رسول, هدف, [ييم]… [لول]
بجدّيّة مع ذلك, هناك أداة يطمر في نافذات [إكسب]… شبكة يرسل. it’s what produced those annoying pop-up messenger spam messages before sp2.
syntax.. net send
Doesn’t work though unless both machines have the messenger service running and are configured to allow the messages through firewalls.
yes…. you can use IM programs IF YOU LIKE VIRUSES, WORMS, and other attacks!
well I WAS kinda joking about the IM programs. I’d never actually recomend IM programs to inexperienced netizens for obvious reasons. For the record though, I use MSN Messenger all the time. I’ve NOT ONCE caught a nasty from it. I’ve had a nasty offered to me twice, but I use common sense.
Also, I don’t talk to random people - I talk only to those I know.
I never give out personal or sensitive info, and I remain firewalled - through both my routers NAT and a software firewall on my machine, etc, etc, etc…
well I WAS kinda joking about the IM programs. I’d never actually recomend IM programs to inexperienced netizens for obvious reasons. For the record though, I use MSN Messenger all the time. I’ve NOT ONCE caught a nasty from it. I’ve had a nasty offered to me twice, but I use common sense.
Also, I don’t talk to random people - I talk only to those I know.
Good point, for IM progs to infect you , its normal practice to be asked if you want the infection(file transfer etc) and you gotta be crazy to say ‘yes please,do your worst!’
so any infection is usually through user stupidity with IM progs
Actually, that’s not entirely what I was saying. There’s more to it than just infection - IM technology has a whole host of security issues (potential or real), plus potentially creates yet another set of attack vectors on a targe machine using the technology (ie, just another thing that can go wrong). Instant messaging is inherantly insecure. For more details on why it’s inherantly insecure, you can use google, but if you can’t be bothered, I’ve searched up the following link…
http://www.sans.org/rr/whitepapers/protocols/1239.php
The above is a 2003 whitepaper, and some things may well have changed. I’ve only scanned it over briefly to find that it has relevant content, but don’t know how up to date it is. It will however give you a brief overview of the insecurity of IM technologies.
Actually, that’s not entirely what I was saying. There’s more to it than just infection - IM technology has a whole host of security issues (potential or real), plus potentially creates yet another set of attack vectors on a targe machine using the technology (ie, just another thing that can go wrong). Instant messaging is inherantly insecure. For more details on why it’s inherantly insecure, you can use google, but if you can’t be bothered, I’ve searched up the following link…
http://www.sans.org/rr/whitepapers/protocols/1239.php
The above is a 2003 whitepaper, and some things may well have changed. I’ve only scanned it over briefly to find that it has relevant content, but don’t know how up to date it is. It will however give you a brief overview of the insecurity of IM technologies.
Interesting, good info. Think we should all read this…
Leave your response!
Search
Subscribe for Daily Updates
Free Feed Subscription
Monthly Archives
Topics
What others are Saying ?