Envoyez le message à un IP address
IPMessage.net est un concept qui te permet d'envoyer un message à n'importe quel IP address. Le message lui-même ne va pas à cet IP address mais quand la personne avec cet IP visite le même emplacement il voit le message montré pour lui.
L'idée est unique simple et joli car elle indique non seulement votre IP mais te permet également d'envoyer le message ce qui vous pouvez l'employer pour le message privé ou secret. Je ne suis pas sûr si ceci va fonctionner si quelqu'un emploie la procuration.
Ainsi si vous voulez envoyer secrètement à quelqu'un un message et toi sachez que son IP ceci peut venir dans maniable. Message d'IP d'essai
Connexe : ? Causerie sur le LAN avec le messager d'IP
Étiquettes : messager d'IP, envoyez le message d'IP, tcp_messenger
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Signalé le 19 août 2008 près Ashish Mohta , Blogger de technologie d'A qui écrit au sujet de résoudre des problèmes quotidiens des personnes qui utilisent l'ordinateur. Il écrit également sur la façon dont employer les applications comme l'Office, les bouts de PC, les outils en ligne, les navigateurs et plus. Tous les poteaux près Ashish Mohta | Reliez à moi @
Twitter |
Linkedin |
Facebook |
Trébuchement
| Ayez besoin de plus d'aide ? Posez vos questions au notre Centre d'assistance
comment je faites cela
comment j'envoie à un message de mon IP address à quelqu'un l'IP address
y a il un programme pour le faire
Bienvenue au techspot.
Pour répondre à votre question, oui. skype, messager de msn, but, lol de yim…
Seriously though, there is a tool embedded in windows xp… net send. it’s what produced those annoying pop-up messenger spam messages before sp2.
syntax.. net send
Doesn’t work though unless both machines have the messenger service running and are configured to allow the messages through firewalls.
yes…. you can use IM programs IF YOU LIKE VIRUSES, WORMS, and other attacks!
well I WAS kinda joking about the IM programs. I’d never actually recomend IM programs to inexperienced netizens for obvious reasons. For the record though, I use MSN Messenger all the time. I’ve NOT ONCE caught a nasty from it. I’ve had a nasty offered to me twice, but I use common sense.
Also, I don’t talk to random people - I talk only to those I know.
I never give out personal or sensitive info, and I remain firewalled - through both my routers NAT and a software firewall on my machine, etc, etc, etc…
well I WAS kinda joking about the IM programs. I’d never actually recomend IM programs to inexperienced netizens for obvious reasons. For the record though, I use MSN Messenger all the time. I’ve NOT ONCE caught a nasty from it. I’ve had a nasty offered to me twice, but I use common sense.
Also, I don’t talk to random people - I talk only to those I know.
Good point, for IM progs to infect you , its normal practice to be asked if you want the infection(file transfer etc) and you gotta be crazy to say ‘yes please,do your worst!’
so any infection is usually through user stupidity with IM progs
Actually, that’s not entirely what I was saying. There’s more to it than just infection - IM technology has a whole host of security issues (potential or real), plus potentially creates yet another set of attack vectors on a targe machine using the technology (ie, just another thing that can go wrong). Instant messaging is inherantly insecure. For more details on why it’s inherantly insecure, you can use google, but if you can’t be bothered, I’ve searched up the following link…
http://www.sans.org/rr/whitepapers/protocols/1239.php
The above is a 2003 whitepaper, and some things may well have changed. I’ve only scanned it over briefly to find that it has relevant content, but don’t know how up to date it is. It will however give you a brief overview of the insecurity of IM technologies.
Actually, that’s not entirely what I was saying. There’s more to it than just infection - IM technology has a whole host of security issues (potential or real), plus potentially creates yet another set of attack vectors on a targe machine using the technology (ie, just another thing that can go wrong). Instant messaging is inherantly insecure. For more details on why it’s inherantly insecure, you can use google, but if you can’t be bothered, I’ve searched up the following link…
http://www.sans.org/rr/whitepapers/protocols/1239.php
The above is a 2003 whitepaper, and some things may well have changed. I’ve only scanned it over briefly to find that it has relevant content, but don’t know how up to date it is. It will however give you a brief overview of the insecurity of IM technologies.
Interesting, good info. Think we should all read this…
Leave your response!
Subscribe for Daily Updates
Free Feed Subscription
Weekly Podcast
Monthly Archives
Topics
What others are Saying ?