Trasmetta il messaggio ad un IP address
IPMessage.net è un concetto che permette che trasmettiate un messaggio a tutto il IP address. Il messaggio in se non va a quel IP address ma quando la persona con quel IP visita lo stesso luogo lui vede il messaggio visualizzato per lui.
L'idea è unico semplice e grazioso poichè non solo dice al vostro IP ma inoltre che permette che trasmettiate il messaggio quale potete usarli per il messaggio riservato o segreto. Non sono sicuro se questo sta andando funzionare se qualcuno sta usando la procura.
Così se desiderate segretamente trasmettere qualcuno un messaggio e voi sappia che il suo IP questo può venire in pratico. Messaggio del IP di prova
Relativo:? Chiacchierata sulla lan con il messaggero del IP
Modifiche: messaggero del IP, trasmetta il messaggio del IP, tcp_messenger
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Inviato il 19 agosto 2008 vicino Ashish Mohta , Blogger di tecnologia di A che scrive circa risolvere i problemi quotidiani della gente che utilizza il calcolatore. Inoltre scrive su come usare le applicazioni come l'ufficio, le punte del pc, gli attrezzi in linea, i Browsers e più. Tutti gli alberini vicino Ashish Mohta | Colleghi con me @
Twitter |
Linkedin |
Facebook |
Inciampata
| Abbia bisogno di più aiuto? Faccia le vostre domande al nostro Centro di sostegno
come faccia quello
come trasmetto ad un messaggio dal mio IP address a qualcuno il IP address
è ci un programma per farlo
Benvenuto a techspot.
Per rispondere alla vostra domanda, sì. skype, messaggero del msn, scopo, lol del yim…
Seriously though, there is a tool embedded in windows xp… net send. it’s what produced those annoying pop-up messenger spam messages before sp2.
syntax.. net send
Doesn’t work though unless both machines have the messenger service running and are configured to allow the messages through firewalls.
yes…. you can use IM programs IF YOU LIKE VIRUSES, WORMS, and other attacks!
well I WAS kinda joking about the IM programs. I’d never actually recomend IM programs to inexperienced netizens for obvious reasons. For the record though, I use MSN Messenger all the time. I’ve NOT ONCE caught a nasty from it. I’ve had a nasty offered to me twice, but I use common sense.
Also, I don’t talk to random people - I talk only to those I know.
I never give out personal or sensitive info, and I remain firewalled - through both my routers NAT and a software firewall on my machine, etc, etc, etc…
well I WAS kinda joking about the IM programs. I’d never actually recomend IM programs to inexperienced netizens for obvious reasons. For the record though, I use MSN Messenger all the time. I’ve NOT ONCE caught a nasty from it. I’ve had a nasty offered to me twice, but I use common sense.
Also, I don’t talk to random people - I talk only to those I know.
Good point, for IM progs to infect you , its normal practice to be asked if you want the infection(file transfer etc) and you gotta be crazy to say ‘yes please,do your worst!’
so any infection is usually through user stupidity with IM progs
Actually, that’s not entirely what I was saying. There’s more to it than just infection - IM technology has a whole host of security issues (potential or real), plus potentially creates yet another set of attack vectors on a targe machine using the technology (ie, just another thing that can go wrong). Instant messaging is inherantly insecure. For more details on why it’s inherantly insecure, you can use google, but if you can’t be bothered, I’ve searched up the following link…
http://www.sans.org/rr/whitepapers/protocols/1239.php
The above is a 2003 whitepaper, and some things may well have changed. I’ve only scanned it over briefly to find that it has relevant content, but don’t know how up to date it is. It will however give you a brief overview of the insecurity of IM technologies.
Actually, that’s not entirely what I was saying. There’s more to it than just infection - IM technology has a whole host of security issues (potential or real), plus potentially creates yet another set of attack vectors on a targe machine using the technology (ie, just another thing that can go wrong). Instant messaging is inherantly insecure. For more details on why it’s inherantly insecure, you can use google, but if you can’t be bothered, I’ve searched up the following link…
http://www.sans.org/rr/whitepapers/protocols/1239.php
The above is a 2003 whitepaper, and some things may well have changed. I’ve only scanned it over briefly to find that it has relevant content, but don’t know how up to date it is. It will however give you a brief overview of the insecurity of IM technologies.
Interesting, good info. Think we should all read this…
Leave your response!
Subscribe for Daily Updates
Free Feed Subscription
Weekly Podcast
Monthly Archives
Topics
What others are Saying ?