寄發消息到IP地址
IPMessage.net是允許您寄發消息到所有IP地址的概念。 消息不去那個IP地址，但是，當人與那IP參觀同一個站點時他為他看被顯示的消息。
想法是簡單和相當獨特的，因為它不僅告訴您的IP，而且允許您傳送信息哪些您能為私有或秘密消息使用它。 我不是肯定的，如果這運作，如果某人使用代理人。
如此，如果您想要秘密地傳送某人信息和您知道他們的Ip這可能遲早有用。 嘗試IP消息
相關： 閒談在Lan與IP信使
標記： ip信使, 傳送ip信息, tcp_messenger
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
張貼在2008年8月19日 Ashish Mohta A寫關於解決人的每日問題使用計算機的技術blogger。 他也寫關於怎樣使用應用像辦公室、個人計算機技巧、網上工具，瀏覽器和更多。 所有崗位 Ashish Mohta | 連接用我@
Twitter |
Linkedin |
Facebook |
絆倒
| 需要更多幫助？ 問您的問題在我們 供應中心
怎麼我做那
怎麼我從我的IP地址寄發一則消息到大約一個IP地址
有要做它的節目
歡迎到techspot。
回答您的問題，是。 skype， msn信使，目標， yim… lol
嚴重雖則，有在Windows XP…網埋置的工具送。 it’s what produced those annoying pop-up messenger spam messages before sp2.
syntax.. net send
Doesn’t work though unless both machines have the messenger service running and are configured to allow the messages through firewalls.
yes…. you can use IM programs IF YOU LIKE VIRUSES, WORMS, and other attacks!
well I WAS kinda joking about the IM programs. I’d never actually recomend IM programs to inexperienced netizens for obvious reasons. For the record though, I use MSN Messenger all the time. I’ve NOT ONCE caught a nasty from it. I’ve had a nasty offered to me twice, but I use common sense.
Also, I don’t talk to random people - I talk only to those I know.
I never give out personal or sensitive info, and I remain firewalled - through both my routers NAT and a software firewall on my machine, etc, etc, etc…
well I WAS kinda joking about the IM programs. I’d never actually recomend IM programs to inexperienced netizens for obvious reasons. For the record though, I use MSN Messenger all the time. I’ve NOT ONCE caught a nasty from it. I’ve had a nasty offered to me twice, but I use common sense.
Also, I don’t talk to random people - I talk only to those I know.
Good point, for IM progs to infect you , its normal practice to be asked if you want the infection(file transfer etc) and you gotta be crazy to say ‘yes please,do your worst!’
so any infection is usually through user stupidity with IM progs
Actually, that’s not entirely what I was saying. There’s more to it than just infection - IM technology has a whole host of security issues (potential or real), plus potentially creates yet another set of attack vectors on a targe machine using the technology (ie, just another thing that can go wrong). Instant messaging is inherantly insecure. For more details on why it’s inherantly insecure, you can use google, but if you can’t be bothered, I’ve searched up the following link…
http://www.sans.org/rr/whitepapers/protocols/1239.php
The above is a 2003 whitepaper, and some things may well have changed. I’ve only scanned it over briefly to find that it has relevant content, but don’t know how up to date it is. It will however give you a brief overview of the insecurity of IM technologies.
Actually, that’s not entirely what I was saying. There’s more to it than just infection - IM technology has a whole host of security issues (potential or real), plus potentially creates yet another set of attack vectors on a targe machine using the technology (ie, just another thing that can go wrong). Instant messaging is inherantly insecure. For more details on why it’s inherantly insecure, you can use google, but if you can’t be bothered, I’ve searched up the following link…
http://www.sans.org/rr/whitepapers/protocols/1239.php
The above is a 2003 whitepaper, and some things may well have changed. I’ve only scanned it over briefly to find that it has relevant content, but don’t know how up to date it is. It will however give you a brief overview of the insecurity of IM technologies.
Interesting, good info. Think we should all read this…
Leave your response!
Search
Subscribe for Daily Updates
Free Feed Subscription
Monthly Archives
Topics
What others are Saying ?